Author |
Topic  |
|
foolpittier
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
374 Posts |
Posted - 03/27/2011 : 16:51:17
|
would you keep ryan suter in a keeper pool?
|
|
nuxfan
PickupHockey All-Star
   

3670 Posts |
Posted - 03/27/2011 : 17:44:44
|
what are you other options? |
 |
|
ryan93
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
996 Posts |
Posted - 03/27/2011 : 20:47:48
|
As nux said, depends what your other options are. He's still young at 26 and is part of a strong defensive team in Nashville (has a very nice +27 this season which helps out in the pool). While you shouldn't expect him to develop into a top flight offensive blueliner, he should be a lock for 30-50 points a year for the next decade. Personally i'd probably lean towards holding onto him, but again it just depends on what else is out there (either FA's or through trade), and how the points system works in your league. |
 |
|
foolpittier
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
374 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 02:01:47
|
the pool is offence only, 1 pt goal, 1point assist, pp/sh goals 2pts forward and d, goalies 2pts win, 4 pts shut out.
that's it. |
 |
|
nuxfan
PickupHockey All-Star
   

3670 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 09:07:51
|
yes, but what are your options if you drop Suter? Assuming you have to replace him with another body, who is available? Its hard to make a decision on whether to drop him otherwise. |
 |
|
Guest2691
( )
|
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 10:20:59
|
I would not keep him in a keeper pool |
 |
|
foolpittier
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
374 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 16:33:37
|
bufuglyn, shattenkirk, goligoski and elder are all unpicked. |
 |
|
nuxfan
PickupHockey All-Star
   

3670 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 16:40:56
|
I would take any of those over Suter. |
 |
|
ryan93
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
996 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 16:48:43
|
Same here. |
 |
|
foolpittier
PickupHockey Pro
 

Canada
374 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 16:59:09
|
thank's for the input. |
 |
|
nuxfan
PickupHockey All-Star
   

3670 Posts |
Posted - 03/28/2011 : 22:19:16
|
and if I were to rank them, from top to bottom, it would be Edler, Byfuglien, Goligoski, and Shattenkirk. |
 |
|
|
Topic  |
|