| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Jumbo Joe Rocks |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 10:08:56
I recieve
Burrows
Hodgson
Schnieder
Ballard
2nd Rd Pick
1st Rd Pick
for
I trade
Nash
Garon |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Awesome One |
Posted - 02/17/2011 : 08:34:43
quote:
Originally posted by Jumbo Joe Rocks
Antoher question
I have recieved an offer for versteeg but I give up Ryan Johansen.
Thoughts?
Nooooo!
Johansen is one of the top prospects in the game, and has great potential and upside.
Don't do it!
There was once a license plate in Toronto that abbreviated "Go Leafs" it read "Golfs". |
| Jumbo Joe Rocks |
Posted - 02/17/2011 : 08:20:32
Antoher question
I have recieved an offer for versteeg but I give up Ryan Johansen.
Thoughts? |
| Jumbo Joe Rocks |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 19:31:51
quote:
Originally posted by Guest2864
quote:
Originally posted by nuxfan
oh - someone is offering you all that for Nash and a tandem goalie in the declining years of production? Holy, I'd take that.
This is a keeper league, right?
Yeah
Faill I forgot ot log in |
| Guest2864 |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 19:29:08
quote:
Originally posted by nuxfan
oh - someone is offering you all that for Nash and a tandem goalie in the declining years of production? Holy, I'd take that.
This is a keeper league, right?
Yeah |
| nuxfan |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 15:57:22
oh - someone is offering you all that for Nash and a tandem goalie in the declining years of production? Holy, I'd take that.
This is a keeper league, right? |
| foolpittier |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 15:56:43
i'd go for it, just for the pick's alone, burrows and hodgson sould = 1 nash and garon suck's anyway... do it up. |
| Jumbo Joe Rocks |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 13:08:21
Sorry I am the team trading Nash so I should accept it and trade Nash? |
| Beans15 |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 12:36:48
That sounds like an NHL 11 trade to me. 
NO, NO, NO, NO. That's my answer. Too much swinging one way on that deal. |
| nuxfan |
Posted - 02/16/2011 : 11:13:48
this sounds like a keeper pool? If so, I would not do that.
Nash is a great player, no doubt, and individually better than either of Hodgson or Ballard. However, Hodgson is unproven yet, and throwing in picks as well - you're trading a significant portion of your future for Nash. I don't think Hodgson will be as good as Nash, but he certainly has the ability to be a very good player. Who knows what your first and second picks will be.
I think that Schneider has way more upside than Garon. Schneider will, IMO, be a starter in the NHL in 3 years time - almost certainly not for VAN, but somewhere. Garon is at best a tandem goalie on a weak team - he had 2 pretty good non-sequential years, but his best days are behind him.
You could always counter by removing Schneider from the trade - if Schneider were not included I might consider that.
|
